I don’t tend to follow royal events, as they are mostly just one of the ways the UK media distracts the people from more important topics. Such as the fact that the UK now has one of the highest per capita recorded death rates from Covid in the world, with nurses rewarded with a defacto pay cut (once inflation is accounted for), with some of their jobs to go later once the NHS is privatised. But this Meghan Markle business is worth commenting on. As it reveals a lot about the UK media, the rich and the institutional racism at the core of both.
The media and the UK’s wealthy elites have always had it in for Meghan Markle and its not difficult to understand why. The ultimate goal of many of the UK’s wealthy is to climb the social ladder. And there are various ways you do that, being rich is obviously one way, better yet old money (a million of old money and a baronet is worth a billion in new money), having a title (baron, duke, peer, etc.) or as many middle names as possible, going to the right school (Eton, Harrow, etc.) or best of all being a member of the royal family. So you can see how the Mayfair set would react to this upstart (as they would see Meghan) rolling in and jumping the queue ahead of them all, just by marrying a prince.
And then there’s is this issue of institutional racism and class snobbery. Its one of the way’s the UK’s wealthy elites sleep at night. Rather than accept they have attained this wealth by screwing over the poor, either in the UK or overseas (and a lot of the old money wealth was built on the back of the slave trade, or exploitation of colonies during the age of empire), instead they engage in victim blaming. Its poor people’s fault that they are poor. Nothing to do with Tory policy. If ethnic minorities are being discriminated against, it must be their own fault as well because insert racist stereotype here. And, as I mentioned in a previous post, you don’t have to be white to be a racist. Its not unusual for some of those from non-white backgrounds to start adopting the same racist views after awhile.
Which may have something to do with the UK’s public school system (what they call private schools over here) where racism is practically part of the curriculum. They are, to the wealthy, what the madrasa’s are to Islamic State. They are institutions which indoctrinate kids with a wide variety of dangerous ideas, such as that you can just blag your way to success, British exceptionalism (the failure of UK brexit negotiations can largely be blamed on this), as well as the glorification of the British Empire, without dwelling too much on its many downsides (you know slavery, murder, massacres, the Opium wars, famines, overall tens of millions of people killed).
So inevitably you end up with a bunch of casually racist posh twits being churned out to replace the current crop of racist posh twits. They are basically a re-spawning system for upper class bigots. And you can imagine the social horror for these posh gin swilling types when they are told that, not only is Meghan (a commoner, American and of mixed race) now above them in the pecking order. But protocol now means they have to bow to her and call her “your Royal Highness”. And inevitably this hatred boiled over into the media.
While tabloid newspaper journalists are also a pretty racist lot (many of whom went to the same private schools), royal correspondents tend to be on a different level. If you are a bit posh, have an obsession with horses, at least 3 middle names and are a bit more racist than everyone else in the office, congratulations, you’re now the newspaper’s royal correspondent. In most other companies making a racist remark earns you diversity training and being put in charge of the United Way, in a UK tabloid they just make you the royal correspondent.
And we’ve seen some absolute howlers as the media tried to defend themselves. There was the very public downfall of Pier’s Morgan. But also a whole bunch of other articles from Royal correspondents along the lines of how could we be called racist for constantly attacking the one black woman in the royal family? Another preposterously suggested that the UK media have a long history of “holding the elites to account”. Ya, sure pull the other one.
The tabloids would happily run 50 page specials on Meghan (or some other celebrity with left wing sympathies), based mostly on rumour, dubious sources (such as her estranged dad, after they’ve bribed him to say what they want him to say) or just plain old lies. Yet they’ve largely ignored the many affairs Farage is rumoured to have had (never mind his involvement in doggy ponzi schemes), nor the fact we still don’t know exactly how many kids Boris Johnson has had out of wedlock from his numerous affairs.
Similarly they’ll do a 28 page special on Corbyn’s links to the Sinn Fein, but ignore the links between the DUP and loyalist terrorist groups (whom the Tories regularly go into coalition or work closely with). They’ll go to town on the slightest mistake a left wing politician makes (as is the case with Nicola Sturgeon right now), but a Tory can be caught essentially stealing from the public purse to the tune of tens of billions, or openly breaking the law to help their mates and not a peep out of the right wing media. This is the very definition of racism and media bias.
Much like the police in the US, its not just one or two rotten eggs, its the entire system. The UK media is no more fair and balanced than the news media is in Pyongyang. And while one could look at ultimately passing new laws to make the media more accountable for its actions, but that’s not going to happen. No way labour’s going even talk about that for fear of making waves. I mean despite what’s happening with brexit, they still won’t even admit it was a mistake.
Instead, I’d take a leaf out of the book of a wine merchant who recently had issues due to brexit. He simply tweeted about these issues with the hashtag #teethingproblems and within a few hours the head of HMRC was ringing him up to apologise. Yes its true the Tories and their allies have used social media to good effect, most notably in the run up to the brexit vote, but its also their Achilles heel. They know that if certain facts, that they’d otherwise like to keep hidden, start going viral they can’t rely on their control of the media to keep it quiet. And there’s now a host of new media outlets operating over the internet (the Byline Times is a good example). Some even doing news casts via youtube. It could be a way forward.
You must be logged in to post a comment.