What have Borat, Lukashenko, Kim Jung-Un and Cameron got in common?

Well the answer is that none of them seem to like the European convention on Human rights. The brain child of a certain Winston Churchill (who if we believe UKIP must have been some fluffy lefty who obviously hated Britain), this convention protects people from such things as “torture” or “cruel and unusual punishment”…which is probably why UKIP don’t want it as the thought of any of em in Parliament has to count! 😳

Jokes aside though this is a bonkers policy that is so silly it has the rest of the EU baffled. Obviously enough it would mean the UK being chucked out of the EU. It would also mean Britain being relegated to a rogue’s gallery of nations that includes the likes of Kazakhstan and Belarus. This would of course have a wide host of legal implications, notably for example making it impossible for the UK to arrange the extradition of suspects…so all any criminal needs to do is make a break for the border and he’s home free!

Consider for example Abu Qatada, recently cleared of charges in Jordan. Well if the UK decided to try and get him back here for trial, we could well face the absurdity of the UK’s lack of commitment to human rights being used by his lawyers as reasons against his extradition back to Britain! This after the big legal battle to get him out of the UK while protecting his human rights.

To say this would be embarrassing and damaging to the UK is to put it mildly. Somewhere in Russia I suspect Putin is pissing himself with laughter at the field day he’s going to have if Cameron has his way. It could not just cost the UK a place in the EU, but numerous other bodies, such as the UNHCR as well as effected Britain’s continued membership of the UN.

And it’s worth reflecting on the fact that the main opposition to Qatada, wasn’t the European courts, but those right here in the UK. The problem is that the UK lacks a constitution, a rare thing for any country in the 21st century. The UK’s arcane justice systems also places too much emphasis on the ability of judges to essentially make things up as they go along, but still be bound by decisions made previously by other judges. By contrast in most EU states, the constitution effectively takes precedence (up to a point of course!). All Cameron will succeed in doing is relocate the problem from Strasbourg to the UK.

The solution to the UK’s woe’s here is simply to bring in a UK constitution, something I’ve been saying for a while, but which was recently echoed by none other than the head of the UK supreme court. And incidentally a constitution would also protect the UK from any fears of an EU super state, as any further EU integration would require a constitutional change and thus a referendum in the UK to approve it.


4 thoughts on “What have Borat, Lukashenko, Kim Jung-Un and Cameron got in common?

  1. Pingback: What have the Europeans ever done for us? | daryanblog

  2. Pingback: The death of democracy? | daryanblog

  3. Pingback: The legality of brexit | daryanblog

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s