Jeremy Clarkson has gotten a bit of a name for himself attacking all manner of things, from advocating Communist style repression of striking workers that even Joe Stalin would regard as going too far :no:, to insulting disabled people U-(, the families of suicide victims, lorry drivers, caravan’s (welll I can understand that one! they are a strange lot!) and nature lovers. Hes also pissed off the electric car lot by allegedly staging breakdowns of their vehicles |-| (hes being sued by Tesla motors and Nissan claim to have evidence from a GPS tracker unit that their Leaf electric car was intentionally discharged by driving around a roundabout and the scene of one being pushed was staged).
Now hes started on Mountaineers, bemoaning the amount of money spend rescuing them each year and the fact that poor prince William is being forced to fly around Snowdon every weekend and pick up commoners :oops:. His arseiness said :lalala::
But why should I fund the rescue of a rambler?….He or she chose to go out there in the mountains. He or she knew the risks. And Im sorry but if they fall over and get gangrene, they cant furtle around in my wallet for assistance.
Well firstly lets get our facts straight, the key lynch pin of Mountain Rescue is not the helicopters but the many thousands of unpaid volunteers members of Mountain Rescue Teams who co-ordinate searches, ultimately find the people for the helicopter to pick up and as it were do the bulk of the rescuing. They are a shining example of what Jeremys buddy Cameron calls the big society. And its not just fellow mountaineers that they rescue, but motorists (like Clarkson) whom they helped rescue the previous winters, and on one occasion the crew of an RAF helicopter that actually froze up in mid air during a rescue operation.
Of course if we take Clarksons attitude then next time theres a snow storm youd best keep a credit card handy :>>. After all those motorists who went out driving in the snow and then had to be rescued by the police/mountain rescue, they knew the risks and should obviously be made liable for the cost of their rescue, or drag their frostbitten I-pod deprived kids across the snow for several miles to find help. And how about getting motorists to pay something approaching the true costs of motoring? (about 3 times more than they currently pay!) Or how about a certain idiotic TV presenter who goes by the nickname of Hamster who went and nearly killed himself trying to drive a drag racing car and had to be evacuated by air ambulance. Clearly he knew the risks and why should my taxes pay for his rescue and treatment? No, if we follow Clarksons point of view, his moronic co-presenters should have been forced to carry him while trying to hold his brain damage skull together, to the nearest A&E where a matron should have been waiting for them with a credit card swipe.
Theres also a fallacy here that the RAF/RN helicopter pilots roll their eyes skyward every time they get the call to pluck some rambler off the side of a hill. Actually they are more than happy to do it. Why? Because to them its good training, allowing them and their crew to clock up more of those all important flying hours under challenging conditions (given that rescues are often at night and in bad weather). One of the key things any young aviator needs to do is build up his portfolio of flying hours, as this determines future promotion or the chances of a combat posting (which leads to yet more flying hours in a challenging environment and thus good promotion prospects). Its no surprise that Prince William has been posted to one of the countrys busiest rescue centres as that will allow him to clock up lots of flying hours very quickly. And at some point theyll need to promote him to senior rank (as they do to all royals) and to avoid the accusation of fix the military will whip out his flying record and show how much flying hes done under difficult conditions and that its perfectly normal for such persons to be promoted.
Indeed I do note that there seems to be a much stronger willingness of the RAF/RN to commit a helicopter to any rescue in the UK, compared to other countries. So this is good news for everybody; aircrew, mountain rescue, the police, coastguard, those being rescued of course (of which mountaineers are but a tiny fraction). Everybody that is – unless youre HM Treasury! Who are probably getting a bit sick of all these invoices with the word rescue written on top landing on theyre desks. This explains why they want to privatise search and rescue services. Unfortunately as the RAF/RN pilots will still need to train (else youll end up with a lack of experienced aircrews and the same Troy lot crying about search and rescue costs will be moaning about how the Irish aircorps have more experience pilots than the UK). So it will just mean two sets of slightly smaller bills landing on the treasurys desk, one labelled training the other rescue. My suspicion is that when you add them up, theyll work out higher than the current status quo, so its a false economy.
The fact of the matter is that we all do risky things from time to time. Often the most dangerous time of the day for a mountaineer can be the drive to the foot of the mountain. Do you have any idea how many car accidents and fatalities there are on the roads each year? And what about the pedestrians and cyclists who motorists knocked down? A range of figures comparing different statistics for sports (against other activities) can be found here and here. As you can see they both rate mountaineering (and even rock climbing) with a accident/fatality risk well below other sports such as soccer, watersports or motorsports (these three vive for top place depending on how you do youre counting) or indeed other activities such as driving in general. Even on a per capita basis (i.e. taking into account that so few people climb against the many more who play football) mountaineering still only rates as moderately risk (i.e. less risky that driving!).
Oddly enough this link from America puts cheerleading on top 88| for danger….Im afraid to ask if that includes the risk of STDs :no:! Never understood the point of cheerleading other than a form of soft porn…or is American football really that bad :yawn: that fans need some distraction to pass the time!…but I digress!
Its actually the people who dont go out and do any exercise on a weekend that have me worried…such as overweight smokers like Clarkson :crazy: himself. We have an obesity epidemic in this country, with rates of diabetes and heart disease soaring. And do you have any idea of how much it costs NHS to treat hundreds of thousands of these people each year? A lot more than we spend on mountain rescue I think! Indeed I used to know a Pakistani bone setter and he preferred to work weekends (so he could skip the Friday night graveyard shift and not have to deal with drunks). Inevitably most of his customers would be people involved in sporting activities whod over excreted themselves or others who injured themselves doing DIY over the weekend. As he pointed out you were better off taking the risk of seeing him on Saturday afternoon, than seeing Dr Brooks in heart surgery on Monday morning, particularly as about 1 in 12 of heart surgery patients dont last a year! Then again Clarkson would say that they know the risks and presumably should be just pushed in a corner and left to fend for themselves (with a donner kebab one assumes), himself included!
So we need to look at the bigger picture here, mountaineering might be risky and yes it might have certain costs to society, but such risks (and costs) must be seen in the context of many other activities we regularly engage in that are even more risky (and costly), such as driving…or eating big macs!…or how about having affairs? Cant talk much about the last one as I think theres still a super-injunction out >:XX (so Ive just guaranteed youll all go to Google and type in Clarkson AND super injunction).
But if we take Clarksons attitude, i.e. that mountaineering is an unacceptably dangerous risk that society cannot bare the cost of, well wed best ban driving then too, and all water sports, jogging, cycling (then again the biggest hazard to the last two is cars so maybe they can stay), smoking, cheerleading (actually that doesnt sound like a bad idea), DIY, football, Rugby (not that Im volunteering to tell the players mind, well leave that to the cheerleaders :))), big macs and nihilistic womanizing TV presenters. Indeed why dont we just replace the countrys flag with a hammer and sickle…on a denim background!